Samba
Last week saw the release of a new version of Samba, with two security fixes:
http://samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2007-4572.html
http://samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2007-5398.html
Both of these issues sound pretty bad, but only CVE-2007-5398 is truly scary. CVE-2007-4572 initially looked rather bad, but after a thorough analysis it was determined that under normal use the flaw shouldn't even crash the Samba server. A detailed analysis of this flaw can be found here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294631#c3
AppArmor's Security Goals
I'm no fan of AppArmor, but aside from that there is a most interesting read regarding it on Kernel Trap. Those of you interested in such a thing might find it useful:
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/AppArmors_Security_Goals
Hushmail not so hush
It seems that Hushmail is willing to share the PGP keys of its clients with law enforcement:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/65213,hushmail-turns-out-to-be-anything-but.aspx
While this probably isn't terribly surprising (most companies are willing to work with law enforcement). It is an opportunity to point out that unless you have complete control over your encryption key, you should assume that someone else has it. This includes things like storing keys on NFS home directories or using public computers with your private key. Keeping a private key protected properly is very difficult, and everyone has to compromise perfect security for reality at some point. It should be completely obvious though, that trusting someone else, especially a corporation, with your private key is most unwise.
I don't plan to write a column next week due to the holiday weekend. I shall see everyone the week of the 25th, which I'm certain will be eventful.